(English) Happy Stanislav Petrov Day!

vineri, 26 septembrie 2008 Viata ca o prada Niciun comentariu

12 year old hamburger">(English) The 12 year old hamburger

(English)

We interrupt our regular program for a public service announcement. In the picture below you can admire a 12 year old hamburger.

Burger1996

Nothing special has been done to preserve it. Astonishing, isn’t it? Click the picture for more details.

UPDATE 2: The link is working again, please feel free to click through the picture for the full story.

UPDATE: The post has been mysteriously removed. I’ve copied some of the text (by Karen Hanrahan) below.

This is a hamburger from McDonalds that I purchased in 1996.

That was 12 years ago.

Note that it looks exactly like it did the very day I bought it.

The flecks on the bun are crumbs from the bun.

The burger is starting to crumble a bit

It has the oddest smell.

The paper and bag in the backround is circa 2008 — to add decor to the photo.
…People always ask me — what did you do to preserve it ?

Nothing — it preserved itself.

Ladies, Gentleman, and children alike — this is a chemical food. There is absolutely no nutrition here.

Not one ounce of food value. Or at least value for why we are eating in the first place.

The burger on the right, off the paper is a 2008 burger. I had to buy it to get the groovy paper and bag.

The meat is a tad darker, the bun a little less golden but in 12 years it will look exactly like that too.

Do you find this horrifying?

McDonalds fills an empty space in your belly. It does nothing to nourish the cell, it is not a nutritious food.

It is not a treat.

I marvel at how McDonalds has infiltrated our entire world. A hamburger here tastes exactly the same in China or some around the world place.

It’s cloned.

Makes you wonder doesn’t it?

Do me a favor and share this.

joi, 25 septembrie 2008 De zi cu zi 4 comentarii

(English) The value of money

(English) moneyMy money’s worthless. But that’s ok, because so are yours. Or rather, they have exactly the value you think they have. Which is a pretty neat trick to pull for a piece of paper.

The main purpose of any commercial enterprise in this world is to make money. Or, to translate in marketspeak, to create value for their customers, and thus create value for themselves. This value is created by you, me, and anybody else who works for a living, by converting our time and skills into products that are useful for other companies and/or other human beings. This has always been so. In the past it was worth knowing how to plow a field, how to shoot a bow, how to distinguish the really bad mushrooms from the merely poisoned ones. These were all skills one could turn into profit.

Enter the banks. Banks do not create value directly, by themselves, but rather help create value, by lending money to active companies and individuals that need money to exercise their skills in order to create value. In return, a portion of this value returns to the bank. Banks also help people save money, and pay interest for the right to use those money for lending. In effect, banks are vast meeting places, where the people that need money meet the people that have money to the mutual benefit of both parties.

Or at least, that’s the theory. In reality banks are no longer safeguarding and managing other people’s money. Banks have and produce value in themselves, above and beyond what is needed to function as a bank. They use their guarantees and deposits as assets, which can themselves become guarantees if the bank itself needs to borrow money. And past events teach us that this reality is quite prone to abuse, often with catastrophic results.

It all boils right back down to value. Since value is a subjective property, driven by the marketplace’s two opposing forces, Fear and respectively Greed, there is always a risk factor involved when evaluating the value of an asset or investment. Take salt, for example.

Salt is now by and large a commodity, to be picked up once a month at the grocer’s and passed around at the dinner table. But it wasn’t always so. Before we discovered how to extract salt from the sea, the only way to acquire salt was to dig deep in the earth an pray for a salt vein. Salt was expensive, treasured. Wars were fought for control over salt mines. And to spill the salt was to invite serious trouble upon oneself.

Now imagine that you would buy a salt mine mere days before the sea salt extraction process came into power. Your rock-solid investment, 100% guaranteed profitable by a thousand years of history will become a loser overnight. Your net worth would plummet accordingly. Any loans that may have been available to you against that mine are now a pipe dream, and if you’re really unlucky you have your creditors knocking at your door.

Those were the salt bubble days. We’re now in the housing bubble days. There also were a dot com bubble, an Asian market bubble, an African lending bubble and lots and lots of other smaller bubbles, distanced about 10 years apart. Each of these bubbles was new and unexpected. Each of these bubbles taught us absolutely nothing about risk management in the marketplace. And if you disagree, get in touch; I can tell you all about some really hot opportunities — biotech startups, gene sequencing, next-gen targeted viruses… the way of the future, man! You can’t afford to miss it!

marţi, 23 septembrie 2008 Mic ghid existential Niciun comentariu
  • Tom Petty & The Heartbrakers - Greatest Hits
  • Queen - Greatest Hits
  • Paolo Conte - The Best Of Paolo Conte
  • Ada Milea - Aberatii sonore
  • Red Hot Chili Peppers - Blood Sugar Sex Magik
  • Nikki Yanofsky - Ella... Of Thee I Swing
  • Dimitri from Paris - Sacrebleu
  • Tom Waits - Swordfishtrombones
  • Golden Earring - The Naked Truth